ACORN is pushing Bristol council leaders to maintain crucial support for low-income families facing cost of living challenges
The council is looking to cut £3.4 million from the scheme, which costs £44.5 million. If this happens, some households may have to start paying council tax for the first time. ACORN, a community union, is urging council members to reconsider these cuts.
Wesley Bear from ACORN expressed deep concern. He said these cuts would unfairly burden the most vulnerable people in Bristol. He reminded council members of their promises to protect this vital support.
Bear emphasized that cutting this scheme would hurt families already facing tough times. He called for real leadership and urged the council to stand with the people of Bristol.
The Labour government is also reducing funds for the Household Support Fund, which started during the pandemic. This fund is expected to continue but at a much lower amount.
If the council tax reduction cuts go through, many low-income households will be affected. Bristol has a larger scheme compared to other major UK cities, making these cuts particularly impactful.
Graham Clapp, who oversees revenue and benefits, noted that Bristol is the only core city maintaining this scheme since 2013. He mentioned the need to evaluate if this approach is still affordable.
The council has faced pressure before regarding this scheme but has backed down from cuts in the past. However, the issue has resurfaced again this year.
Councillor Tim Rippington expressed frustration over the repeated discussions about the scheme. He fears they might end up in the same situation again without any real change.
This time, the council plans to consult with ACORN and other organizations before making any final decisions. They’re also waiting for the government’s spending review to see what funding will be available.
Green Councillor Heather Mack highlighted the importance of involving external stakeholders in the discussion. She wants to gather more information on how the scheme helps people before making decisions.
Mack also mentioned that the scheme’s affordability is tied to government funding. She suggested delaying decisions until they have a clearer picture of future funding.
